Is governance a science?


Politics is the art of choosing values and goals. Governance is the science of achieving them—an empirical question of which laws, regulations, policies, programs, and institutions work best. Even the simplest Utopians understand this distinction.
Politics involves persuasion—occasionally through logic, but more often through rhetoric, emotional appeals, flag-waving, slogan-chanting, and personal attacks. Values are not empirical truths; they cannot be proven in a lab or derived from first principles. They can only be chosen and championed—often loudly and with great conviction, regardless of coherence.
Governance, by contrast, can be approached scientifically. Once the humans select a goal, noble or misguided, they must determine how to achieve it. This requires reason, logic, and a structured method the humans call the Policy Cycle. Consider a typical example:
1. Policy goal: Reduce homelessness. Most humans agree this is worthwhile, though a few insist it “builds character.”
2. Problem analysis: What causes homelessness? Hypotheses include mental illness, addiction, poverty, laziness, or lifestyle preference. Each can be tested empirically for relevance and significance.
3. Hypothesis generation: What might solve it? Options include housing subsidies, universal stipends, addiction treatment, mental-health counseling, or combinations thereof. Each can be evaluated on effectiveness, side effects, cost, value for money, and public reaction.
4. Implementation and evaluation: Deploy the policy, collect data, and measure the results against those same metrics. Was the problem reduced? What did it actually cost? Did the public riot or rejoice?
5. Rehypothesizing and iteration: If the results are suboptimal, reformulate and try again. Repeat until something works—or until the humans get distracted by a fresh crisis.
This cyclical approach treats governance as an empirical science, evolving through evidence, experimentation, and adaptation, not ideology or guesswork. Each iteration brings the humans marginally closer to a functional civilization.
See also:
-
Are negative unintended consequences intentional?
-
Is good governance (GG) really just about how to fail more efficiently?
-
Is tyranny the natural human state?
